Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Identity of killer pneumonia bug confirmed
NewScientist ^ | 02 April 03 | Debora MacKenzie

Posted on 04/02/2003 11:04:38 PM PST by sourcery

Scientists have satisfied key tests that confirm that the virus causing the global outbreak of severe pneumonia is a new type of coronavirus. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) has so far struck down more than 2300 people, and killed 78.

The identification will speed up the testing of victims and their contacts to see how the disease spreads, and how it might be contained. That is badly needed, with new cases being announced each day in Hong Kong and China, and in previously unaffected countries, such as South Africa, the Philippines and Malaysia.

In another sign of the seriousness of the growing outbreak, the World Health Organization issued an unprecedented advisory on Wednesday, warning people not to travel to Hong Kong or the adjacent Guangdong province of China.

SARS first surfaced in Guangdong and was then carried to Hong Kong. China has claimed its epidemic was under control but on Wednesday a further 361 cases, and nine deaths, were revealed to have occurred in Guangdong in March. Also on Wednesday, WHO experts finally got the go-ahead to visit Guangdong.

On a more optimistic note, SARS outbreaks in Vietnam, Singapore and Canada, started by travellers from Hong Kong, have now been largely controlled, according to David Heymann, head of infectious diseases at the WHO.

Heymann says the virus is spread by direct contact, or large droplets of body fluids possibly deposited on surfaces. He rules out spread by tiny, aerosol droplets. "If that was the case we'd have far more cases," he told New Scientist.

Triple test

The cause of the disease has been uncertain, with two suspect viruses having been detected in patients. But on Tuesday, the WHO's Klaus Stöhr, who is coordinating the 11 labs worldwide that are collaborating on SARS, said: "We believe a coronavirus is the major causative agent".

To be definitively declared the cause of SARS, the novel virus must satisfy three conditions known as Koch's postulates. These were devised in 1890 by the German scientist Robert Koch, initially for anthrax infections.

First, the suspect microbe must be isolated from all, or nearly all, cases; second, it must be cultured in isolation; and third, those cultured germs must be able to re-create the disease in a test animal.

Albert Osterhaus of Erasmus University in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, told New Scientist that the coronavirus has now been isolated from patients in several different countries, and grown in several labs.

Now Osterhaus has cracked Koch's third, and toughest postulate. "We have infected an animal," he says. He will not yet reveal what kind, but says he has tested the virus in primates and mice. Besides showing the virus is the pathogen, says Osterhaus, the infected animals can now be used to screen antiviral drugs.

A vaccine would also be extremely valuable. Because vaccines mainly work by inducing antibodies to the pathogen, the fact that recovering SARS patients produce high levels of antibodies is encouraging. Vaccine companies have already been given virus samples, says Stöhr.

Also encouraging are reports that blood serum from convalescents, containing the antibodies, have helped to save 20 severely ill SARS victims in Hong Kong.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coronavirus; kochspostulates; sars; vaccine; virus

1 posted on 04/02/2003 11:04:38 PM PST by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sourcery
To be definitively declared the cause of SARS, the novel virus must satisfy three conditions known as Koch's postulates. These were devised in 1890 by the German scientist Robert Koch, initially for anthrax infections.

I don't like seeing the word anthrax attached to this story, in any way, shape or form! And no, I'm not being paranoid, just couldn't help noticing the word.

2 posted on 04/02/2003 11:12:49 PM PST by ET(end tyranny) (Heavenly Father, please embrace, and protect, our Pres., our troops and those of our true allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
>> Heymann says the virus is spread by direct contact, or large droplets of body fluids possibly deposited on surfaces. He rules out spread by tiny, aerosol droplets. "If that was the case we'd have far more cases," he told New Scientist.

This sounds promissing. I get the feeling that unless you are coughed on or sneezed on, you should be able to avoid exposure with good handwashing habits. (the challenge being getting your children to do the same)

3 posted on 04/02/2003 11:14:41 PM PST by shadowman99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shadowman99
Seems like schools are the breeding grounds. Sheesh, you no more than get your child well and back in the classroom, when they either catch it again, or catch something else.
4 posted on 04/02/2003 11:17:40 PM PST by ET(end tyranny) (Heavenly Father, please embrace, and protect, our Pres., our troops and those of our true allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Conspiracy theories abound about SARS

Another thread just posted. (To assist those that keep a list)

5 posted on 04/02/2003 11:19:34 PM PST by ET(end tyranny) (Heavenly Father, please embrace, and protect, our Pres., our troops and those of our true allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
Don't worry about that. It just happens to be the disease that the inital postulates were formulated on. The first effective vaccine developed by Louis Pasteur was for anthrax in 1881. The anthrax bacterium had first been observed in 1849 and 1863, but Koch was the first to identify it as the causative agent for anthrax and to isolate the Bacillus anthracis microorganism in a pure culture. Pasteur and Koch, in fact, had quite a row about the research. You can read more about it here, if you're interested: http://www.foundersofscience.net/past_koc.htm

It's good to see confirmation that virus is not, in fact, truly airborne. I had always supected such. The high number of infected people (mostly health care workers) indicates that the virus is probably a bit more infective than a basic coronavirus, resulting in more people infected because it was not something they were used to, and thus did not take more stringent precuations. A friend of mine, who is a professor at Vanderbilt, is taking a trip to (of all places) Toronto in the near future. He firmly believes that the threat to the general population is quite low.

This is a nasty bug, to be sure, but it is controllable.

6 posted on 04/02/2003 11:25:55 PM PST by TheBigB (The noose is tightening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
You'd think health care workers would be using stringent precautions. Be the ones most likely to anyway.
7 posted on 04/02/2003 11:35:12 PM PST by ET(end tyranny) (Heavenly Father, please embrace, and protect, our Pres., our troops and those of our true allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
You'd think, but they're only human. Mind you, this is all speculation on my part; but I doubt that all the workers wore masks and gloves in every hospital room if they initially thought the first cases were of ordinary (but more severe) flu.
8 posted on 04/02/2003 11:38:27 PM PST by TheBigB (The noose is tightening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
Yes, but:

The high number of infected people (mostly health care workers)

They all were not infected at once nor in the same area. I would think after the first few deaths of patients, gloves and masks would be a priority.

COURSE, we have to take in account that China kept it hush hush far too long, and THAT makes a difference.

9 posted on 04/02/2003 11:44:21 PM PST by ET(end tyranny) (Heavenly Father, please embrace, and protect, our Pres., our troops and those of our true allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
COURSE, we have to take in account that China kept it hush hush far too long, and THAT makes a difference

Yes, I agree. I'm not sure if I buy the speculation that this was a biowar bug that got loose, but I wouldn't put it past them.

10 posted on 04/02/2003 11:54:45 PM PST by TheBigB ("When I want your opinion, I'll beat it out of you."--Chuck Norris (wish he'd say it to Daschle))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sourcery; ET(end tyranny); shadowman99; TheBigB
My biggest question for this whole outbreak is: Why couldn't they pick a better name for the disease?

Hoof and mouth disease, Legionaire's disease, Whooping Cough, and Chicken Pox, those names are cool.

But SARS?

Anyone have other suggestions?

My suggestions for the virus name:


11 posted on 04/03/2003 12:06:33 AM PST by InShanghai (I was born on the crest of a wave, and rocked in the cradle of the deep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB; Mother Abigail; CathyRyan; Dog Gone; Petronski; per loin; flutters; Jim Noble
If it's not airborne, does that mean there's no point in wearing a mask?
12 posted on 04/03/2003 4:51:53 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
Spread of SARS Possibly Thwarted Isolation in Suspected Va. Case Tests Response to Health Threat .
13 posted on 04/03/2003 4:53:43 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All
'Sars may get out of control'(CDC).
14 posted on 04/03/2003 4:54:58 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Can you post an excerpt of that WP article?
15 posted on 04/03/2003 4:59:19 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
That article says that the CDC is treating some number of the 85 US cases with antibodies. (Very slow load on that site for me).
16 posted on 04/03/2003 5:00:37 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All
SARS Outbreak: WHO Investigation Team Moves To Guangdong China; New Travel Advice Announced.
17 posted on 04/03/2003 5:05:58 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Coronaviruses: this is SARS
18 posted on 04/03/2003 7:55:15 AM PST by B-Chan (Ne messez pas avec le Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson